A private instance, yours alone
An isolated instance for your organization only, covered by the business associate agreement.
Incindra handles protected health information under HIPAA, and its work is built to hold up to judicial scrutiny: cited, reproducible and disclosed.
Signed before any license or key is issued.
Records are used for the matter they were submitted for and nothing else.
Every view, change and export is logged by user and time.
An isolated instance for your organization only, covered by the business associate agreement.
Incindra runs on your firm's or practice's own systems. Records never leave your network.
| What the court asks | Where it comes from | How Incindra answers |
|---|---|---|
| Is the method reliable? | Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (amended 2023); Daubert; Frye in Frye states | A fixed, versioned pipeline: the same records on the same versions reproduce the same analysis. A written methodology and a version log accompany every report. |
| Is it based on sufficient facts? | Rule 702(b) | Every statement is cited to its page in the produced record. |
| Was AI used, and how? | Court standing orders; tribunal procedural orders | Every report carries a use statement recording where AI was used and which versions ran. Every Logos Assist question and answer is logged. |
| Did a qualified person decide? | Rule 702(d); ABA Model Rules 1.1 and 5.3 | Incindra organizes and cites. Counsel, arbitrator, mediator or medical expert decides. |
Before any report is released, fixed software checks run on it. A report that fails one does not go out until the failure is fixed.
Incindra supports professional compliance. It does not replace professional judgment or legal advice.
No side in the outcome
The same method, applied the same way, for whichever side engages first.
Incindra does not testify, diagnose or give causation opinions. Counsel, arbitrator, mediator or medical expert decides.
Measured, not opined
The chronology, causal links and menu analyses run on a fixed, versioned pipeline. Method and model versions are logged, so any analysis can be re-run and compared.
Effort and symptom validity are addressed before any test score is treated as meaningful.
Every line, to its page
No statement without a page reference. Opposing counsel can check every one.
A methodology and admissibility framework, written to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert factors, is available to engaged counsel.